Defective Handbrakes Safety Appliances

//Defective Handbrakes Safety Appliances
Defective Handbrakes Safety Appliances 2018-09-24T20:12:28+00:00

Defective Handbrakes or other Safety Appliances

Defective handbrakes or other safety appliances are far too common. Taking a photo of the defect immediately after injury will help preserve the evidence for your case.

If you are injured due to a defective handbrake or safety appliance it’s important to find an attorney familiar with the parts involved (ie the pawl, etc…) and the rules of operation found in the railroad’s own safety rules.

Knowledge of the Safety Appliance Act and relevant case law is also essential. For example, under the Safety Appliance Act, if a rail vehicles’ couplers failed to couple automatically on even a single impact, then the railroad violated the Act’s requirement pertaining to automatic couplers. (Kavorkian v. CSX Transportation, Inc.) In other words, if a railroader is injured when couplers of in-use cars fail, then the Safety Appliance Act applies and the railroad cannot claim that the injured party is partially at fault for their own injury.

Contact us today for references from satisfied clients injured by defective handbrakes or defective railcar safety appliances.

FELA Case Summaries for Defective Safety Appliances

Conductor Suffers Back Injury Due to Fall from Defective Rail Car

The Plaintiff, a forty-one year old conductor for The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, suffered an injury when an unsecure handhold came loose in his hand. The defect caused the conductor to fall from the side of the rail car to the ground below. He immediately felt excruciating pain in his low back was taken to the hospital. The injury caused the conductor to undergo three back surgeries. The conductor was unable to return to his normal job at the Railroad. R. Bigby v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri. Bristol Baxley of Rome, Arata & Baxley for the Plaintiff/Conductor.

Verdicts and Settlements

Personal Injury, Railroad Injuries
And Maritime Accident Lawyers

$5,000,000.00

Engineer, conductor & brakeman v. Railroad & trucking company

Train Accident

A railroad engineer, conductor and brakeman suffered severe injuries (primarily lumbar spine injuries) in a grade crossing collision in Canadian County, OK when a dump truck hauling a load of sand drove in front of their train.

Tulsa, OK.
$4,000,000.00

Locomotive engineer v. Railroad and trucking company

Train Accident

Engineer perished from burn injuries when the freight train he was operating collided with a gasoline tanker truck at a railroad crossing.

New Orleans, LA
$3,465,000.00

Crew members v. Railroad (confidential settlement) -

Train Accident

We represented several crew members of a train involved in a derailment which occurred allegedly due to defective and poorly maintained railroad tracks. Our clients suffered various physical injuries, …

Orlando, FL
$950,000.00

Truck Driver v. Tire Manufacturer and Ins. Co.

We represented a driver of an 18-wheeler who was injured when a relatively new left front tire on the vehicle suffered a catastrophic failure and the treads separated, causing the truck to careen off of the roadway and into a tree. …

New Orleans, LA
$162,500.00

Passenger v. Railroad

Our client was a very sweet 79 year old lady who was stepping down off of a train, when her foot missed the metal step-stool which had been placed on the ground by the railroad’s employee. She fell to the ground and fractured her left arm, …

Jacksonville, FL
View All Our Results